What the DOL's May 2026 Overtime Rollback Means for Your Ministry
are you paying your employees correctly?
Let a ministry HR expert find out during a Compensation Audit & Analysis.
You were the first to see it: the update from the DOL that meant your budget was about to shift drastically. You cross-referenced the new requirements with state thresholds to figure out the specific number. Then you built the case: a new salary amount, a meticulously rearranged budget that tries to get it all to add up again, and a long and painful pitch to the board about why payroll just skyrocketed. They weren’t thrilled, but it was approved. This is good stewardship: doing right by your people, even when the numbers sting.
Now that budget season is bearing down once again, you discovered that rule is gone. Not phased out. Not delayed. Simply vacated by federal courts and formally erased by the Department of Labor in a technical amendment that took effect May 15, 2026.
Raising salaries, reclassifying roles, bracing for a threshold that kept climbing…for what? First off, you’re allowed to feel a little whiplash right now. You're not alone. We want to help define what actually happened, what it means for the people on your team, and how to move forward with confidence that your employee classifications are in order.
Inside the DOL's May 2026 Overtime Technical Amendment
On May 15, 2026, the Department of Labor published a technical amendment that did something unusual: it removed a rule from the federal register that, in practice, had already been dead for a year and a half. In case 2024 feels like a lifetime ago, let's take a minute to review.
The DOL's original rule, published that April, set up a two-step climb. The exempt salary threshold moved from $684 a week to $844 a week ($43,888 a year) on July 1, 2024, then was set to jump again to $1,128 a week ($58,656 a year) on January 1, 2025. After that, it called for automatic increases every three years, starting July 2027.
Before that second increase could ever take effect, two federal courts in Texas, the Eastern District in November 2024, and Northern District in December, struck the rule down. Both landed on the same problem: the DOL's salary threshold had climbed so high that it was effectively replacing the duties test rather than supporting it, and that's not what the Fair Labor Standards Act allows a salary level to do.
Why the Rule Was Vacated
The courts' reasoning was that the FLSA doesn't exempt someone from overtime because of their paycheck. It exempts them because of what they do day-to-day. This is the duties test that measures decision-making authority, supervisory responsibility, and professional-level judgment. The salary threshold was only ever supposed to work as a floor alongside it, a low bar that screens out those clearly doing hourly-level work, so the DOL doesn't have to run a full duties analysis on every low-wage employee. The 2024 rule pushed that floor so high it stopped acting like a floor and started making the decision on its own.
When a court vacates a rule, that rule is treated as if it never legally existed. The moment those Texas courts struck the 2024 rule down, the old $684 number immediately became the legally correct one, nationwide, with no grace period and no additional filing required.
In practice, though, almost nobody's payroll software got the memo that fast. The DOL's own official regulations, the actual text published in the Code of Federal Regulations, still listed the higher 2024 numbers, because the case was on appeal to the Fifth Circuit and the DOL hadn't yet gone through the process of formally rewriting its own rulebook.
How Ministries Felt the Whiplash
This left plenty of ministries stuck in the middle for over a year, watching two different numbers point in two different directions. Follow the courts, and you were technically correct, but relying on rulings that were still sitting on appeal. Follow the DOL's own published regulations, and you were technically compliant with paperwork that had already been struck down. Some ministries held salaries at the higher, now-invalid number just to stay safe in case the appeal somehow revived it. Others rolled back early and hoped they'd guessed right.
Picture an office manager caught in the middle of it. She genuinely runs day-to-day operations, hiring and scheduling staff, managing a real budget, making independent calls all week. That's exempt-level work under the duties test. But if she's paid $50,000 a year, the 2024 rule would have stripped her of her exemption anyway, not because her duties changed, but because her paycheck fell under a number courts had already thrown out over a year earlier, a number her ministry might still have been anxiously trying to comply with.
In May 2026, the Fifth Circuit dismissed those appeals for good, and the paperwork reverted to the "old" standard. The appeal that created all that uncertainty was finally settled, the courts' ruling is final, and the DOL's own text finally says so in writing. For the first time since 2024, there's exactly one number to follow, not two competing ones.
What the Reinstated Baseline Actually Means
At the end of the day the number that matters for your payroll is $684 per week, or $35,568 a year. That's the standard salary threshold for "white collar" exemptions, exactly where it sat before the 2024 rule ever took effect. The highly compensated employee threshold rolled back too, landing at $107,432 a year.
If your ministry never got around to implementing the 2024 increases or repealed them right away, you're already compliant, and this whole saga is an issue you’ve already put to rest. But if your salaries are still at the higher rate or you reclassified staff to meet the higher bar, then the current number is actually lower than what you're paying them. While this isn't a compliance problem, it is a serious conversation.
The Stewardship Dilemma
Legally, you have room to move. Nothing requires you to keep salaries at the elevated 2024 levels. Rolling a salary back to $35,568 because the federal floor allows it is technically defensible, but it's also the kind of decision that can haunt your staff culture for years.
A pay cut, even one framed as "correcting an overcorrection," will almost definitely land as a negative message about how much the ministry values the person receiving it. It’s more than a number. It’s a stewardship issue.
Weighing Staff Morale Against Budget
Before you even think about editing that salary line, ask yourself what that raise actually did. Did it bring a genuinely underpaid position up to a fairer number? Was it a compliance patch on a role that was never a great fit for exempt status anyway? Both are conversations worth honestly discussing with your finance team instead of quietly revising someone's livelihood.
This is the moment when you really evaluate what good stewardship looks like. While stewarding your ministry's finances well might sound like cutting every dollar you're not legally required to spend, stewardship was never just about the balance sheet. It's about what you do with everything God has entrusted to you, and that includes the people on your payroll. Rolling that salary back might check a box and balance a spreadsheet, but what does it do to your culture?
Picture your staff member's perspective: They got a raise two years ago they didn't ask for. They’ve likely already built it into their family's budget and maybe even felt like the ministry finally recognized what they were actually worth. If that number quietly disappears the moment a court makes it optional, the message they hear isn't "the law changed." It's "we only ever paid you this much because we had to." That's a hard thing to unhear, and it costs you more than money. It could cost you invaluable relational capital with any number of staff who catch wind of the situation.
Outside the neat black and white lines of your budgeting software, remember that this decision will affect that staff member's sense of value. Being a good steward of your finances and a good steward of your people were never actually in competition. Caring well for your staff sometimes costs more than the strictest reading of the law. That's not bad budgeting. It's good stewardship.
Navigating State-Specific Thresholds
It’s worth noting that the federal rollback doesn't touch state law, and several states’ minimum salary thresholds never even came anywhere close to the old $684 floor to begin with. If your ministry operates in one of these states, the DOL's May amendment likely didn’t even move the needle.
California sits at $70,304 a year for all employers. Washington leads the country at $80,168.40. New York's downstate regions, covering New York City, Long Island, and Westchester, require $66,300. Colorado's state-indexed threshold lands at $57,784, and Alaska bumps to $58,240 on July 1, 2026 (a mid-year change that's easy to miss if you're only watching the federal calendar!).
Between your state’s number and the federal one, whichever is higher wins.
Auditing Your Classifications
Whether your ministry was affected or not, though, this is the moment to pause and take a close look at every exempt job description on your staff. Make sure each has earned its classification in the first place because that salary threshold isn’t the deciding factor.
Why the Duties Test Trumps Salary Threshold
A youth pastor who spends most of his week troubleshooting the sound board and printing bulletins can’t be exempt just because their paycheck clears $684 a week. The duties test is what really matters. It asks what that individual does with most of their time, not what their title says on the org chart.
In order to qualify as exempt, a role has to pass at least one of the three different duties tests: executive, administrative, or professional.
The executive test is for people who genuinely run something. They manage the ministry, or a department within it, regularly direct the work of at least two other employees, and have a real voice in hiring, firing, or promotions. Think executive pastor or operations director. Someone just listed as a "team lead" on their job description doesn’t exactly make the cut.
The administrative test is for people whose work keeps the ministry itself running. They use their judgment on things that matter. A business administrator setting budget policy or negotiating vendor contracts fits here. Someone who just processes the paperwork doesn’t.
The professional test can go one of two ways. The first requires an advanced degree as a real prerequisite for the job (i.e., a licensed counselor or a CPA). The other requires real invention, originality, or artistic judgment (but not necessarily a degree). Imagine a worship leader composing original arrangements versus one who's setting up the stage and directing the choir. Remember it's the actual work that makes the final decision.
The youth pastor mentioned above doesn't pass any of the duties tests. He isn't managing people or the ministry, he isn't exercising judgment over significant decisions, and running sound isn't specialized professional work. His title may say “pastor”, but his day-to-day duties say “nonexempt”.
Note: Genuinely ordained clergy carrying out real ministerial functions (i.e., preaching, teaching doctrine, or leading worship as an ordained pastor) fall under a separate legal doctrine called the ministerial exception, not the duties test. Courts have used it to keep certain employment claims, including wage-and-hour claims, out of the picture entirely for true ministerial roles. The ministerial exception is narrow, and it only protects roles that are doing ministerial duties. A "pastor" title attached to a job that's mostly sound boards and bulletins still doesn't get the benefit of either the duties test exemption or the ministerial exception.
Standardizing Non-Exempt Time Tracking
If your classification review turns up a role that needs to shift to nonexempt, all the employee overtime rules apply to that role the same way they'd apply to anyone else. A verbal agreement to "keep it under 40" doesn't cut it. You need to officially reclassify the role in writing on their job description and implement an actual time-tracking method to track their hours.
If you haven’t already, pick one method and use it for everyone. A digital time clock or app-based system beats a paper sign-in sheet nobody remembers to fill out once fall programming ramps up, and it has to work the same way whether someone's in the front office 9 to 5 or leading Wednesday’s late-night rehearsal.
Make sure you’re paying attention to those clocked hours, too. It's common for a newly nonexempt staff member to want to "volunteer" extra hours doing the same kind of work they're paid for. Staying late to help set up a fall festival. Coming in on a Saturday to prep the children's ministry room. If the task looks like their job (even a little bit), the law generally treats that time as hours worked, whether anyone called it “volunteering” or not. Track it and pay it out.
A time-tracking gap is invisible right up until someone asks for back pay, and by then it's not a training conversation anymore. It's a liability.
The Aftereffects of the Back and Forth
You’ve done the hard work these past few years: the research, the budget math, the pitch to a less-than-thrilled board. Remember that none of it was wasted, even if the rule that forced your hand is gone. The hard questions you asked along the way, the understanding you gained about what exempt and nonexempt positions really should look like, and the systems you’ve implemented, are still worth the cost no matter what the DOL does next.
The whiplash reminds us that federal rules move fast and in sometimes unpredictable directions. Good stewardship doesn't depend on which threshold happens to be in effect this month. It’s knowing what your people actually do, documenting it honestly, paying them accordingly, and above all showing them how much you value their vital contributions to your mission.
If you’re not sure your paying your people correctly, or you're not sure where to start, we can help with a Compensation Audit & Analysis, before small classification gaps turn into expensive ones.